« iPods Get Tube-Based Audiophile | Main | TED Conference Intros »
June 30, 2006
Are Podcasts a Waste of
Commentary: Peter Davis, via Scoble, asks "Why listen to a podcast when you can get ten times the content when you read?" Davis questions the growing popularity of podcasts. "This is an inefficient means of receiving information. In the time I can listen to an average podcast, I could have caught up on my 50 favorite blogs, or read a chapter in a book, or read the latest issue of Red Herring magazine. " This idea, that listening to a podcast is a waste of time when you can read things so easily on the Web, is one that people have raised since the early days of podcasting. When people ask this, they aren't really questioning the idea of podcasting so much as they are questioning the perspective of those that do like podcasts. In many ways, podcasts may be an inefficient way of getting information. But books are an inefficient way to find out a story when you can watch the movie version. And watching the movie is inefficient when you can read a professional review and find out what the movie's about and what to think about it. For that matter, meeting someone and falling in love is an inefficient way to procreate. There's more to reading, listening, watching and life than "getting content." Podcasting is growing rapidly not because it's an efficient way to get numbers or facts, but because it's an efficient way of delivering content and ideas can't be reduced to a blurb, a summary or a blog post.
From Are Podcasts a Waste of
Posted by Jason at June 30, 2006 09:48 AM
